Accounting quality tested first
The screen runs before the forecast. A model built on numbers that do not survive scrutiny is precision applied to the wrong figures.
Independent company, sector and credit research for corporate treasuries, investment teams and boards, built from primary filings and a working financial model rather than from consensus commentary.
Most investment research is a conclusion with supporting material attached. The useful version is the opposite: a model you can open, assumptions you can change, and an explicit statement of what would have to be true for the case to work.
You are deciding where capital goes. It may be treasury surplus, a strategic stake, a shortlist of acquisition targets, a sector you are considering entering, or a counterparty whose credit you are about to take on. What is available publicly is either free and superficial or expensive and written for someone else’s mandate.
This service produces research built for the decision in front of you. Every report starts with the filings rather than with a view, runs an accounting quality screen before any valuation is attempted, and delivers a working model rather than a set of conclusions. Where the evidence does not support a case, the report says so. The output is analysis for a named recipient, not a recommendation and not personalised advice.
The decision being supported, the universe, the depth required and the intended readership. Readership matters because it determines the form the report can take and how it may be circulated.
Filings, offer documents, rating rationales, regulatory returns and published data gathered and logged. Data is taken from the primary document rather than from a summary of it.
Run before any forecast is built. If the reported numbers cannot be relied on, forecasting them is a wasted exercise and the report changes direction here.
Historical build, driver-based forecast, cost of capital derivation, valuation across the applicable methods, and scenario testing on the variables that carry the case.
Findings tested against channel input where the mandate includes it, then subjected to internal review by a preparer who did not build the model.
Report and model issued, followed by a working session in which the assumptions are challenged directly rather than presented.
The screen runs before the forecast. A model built on numbers that do not survive scrutiny is precision applied to the wrong figures.
Live formulae, visible assumptions, no locked sheets. Your team can rerun the case months later without commissioning anything.
A screen that only reports the shortlist hides its own bias. The rejected names and the reason for each rejection are part of the output.
Coverage depth follows the metric sets that decide value in each sector. In financial services, the work centres on asset quality, provisioning policy against peers, margin decomposition, deposit or borrowing mix and capital adequacy, with restructured and written-off exposures tracked across years. In manufacturing, on capacity, utilisation, realisation, input cost pass-through and the working capital cycle through a demand downturn. In technology and software, on recurring revenue, net retention, customer concentration, cash conversion and the accounting treatment of development spend. In healthcare, on occupancy, case mix, payer terms and the capital intensity of adding capacity.
| Deliverable | Elapsed time |
|---|---|
| Screening across a defined universe | 1-2 weeks |
| Single company initiation report and model | 2-4 weeks |
| Sector report covering four to six companies | 4-6 weeks |
| Credit or counterparty note | 5-8 business days |
| Quarterly update under ongoing coverage | 5 business days after results |
Listed companies with current filings sit at the shorter end. Unlisted names, group structures with several subsidiaries, or mandates including channel work run longer.
Single reports are contracted on a fixed fee, quoted once the universe and depth are agreed. Ongoing coverage is contracted as a monthly retainer over a named universe, with the update commitment, the turnaround after results and the notice period recorded in the engagement letter.
Delivery is virtual. Reports and models are issued to the named recipients in the engagement letter and are prepared for that readership. We hold no proprietary positions in the securities covered, we receive no payment from any company we research, and no fee is linked to the conclusion reached or to any transaction that follows. Where a mandate would place us on both sides of a matter, we decline it.
These are outside the service, several of them because they are regulated activities carried on elsewhere.
Research is prepared on a stated date from information available on that date. Markets and filings move. Nothing in a report is a commitment to update it outside an ongoing coverage mandate.
Tell us the decision and the universe. A screening pass usually shows within a fortnight whether the deeper work is worth commissioning.
No. What we produce is research: analysis of companies, sectors and instruments, with the assumptions and the model exposed. It is not personalised advice on what you should buy, hold or sell, and it does not consider your financial situation, risk appetite or objectives. Personalised advice is a regulated activity under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations 2013 and is outside this service.
Only where it complies with the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, which govern the preparation and distribution of research reports, including the disclosures that must accompany them. Reports commissioned for internal decision-making are prepared for the named recipient and marked accordingly. Work requiring a registered signatory is performed and signed by a professional holding the relevant registration.
Primary sources wherever possible. Annual reports and XBRL filings from MCA21, stock exchange filings and Regulation 30 disclosures, offer documents on the SEBI website, credit rating rationales, regulatory returns, and published government and industry data. Where a paid database or a broker estimate is used, it is cited. We do not present another firm's conclusion as our own analysis.
Only in a permitted setting: public earnings calls, analyst meets, investor conferences and disclosed one-to-one meetings arranged through the company. We do not accept unpublished price sensitive information, and if it is disclosed to us in a meeting we stop work on that name and record the event. Channel checks with distributors, suppliers and customers are conducted separately and are attributed in the report.
A structured screen for accounting quality before any valuation is attempted. It covers related party transactions and their trend, auditor changes and qualifications, contingent liabilities, the gap between reported profit and operating cash flow, receivable and inventory days against peers, capitalisation policy, promoter share pledging under Regulation 31 and subsidiary performance that offsets the standalone picture.
Yes, within the limits of what is filed. For a private company the work is built from MCA21 financial statements, the audit report and its annexures, charge filings, GST-linked disclosures and channel input. Coverage is less current than for a listed company because filings arrive annually, and the report states the vintage of the most recent data used.
Yes. Ongoing coverage runs as a subscription over a named universe with a quarterly update after each results release, model refresh, and an alert note when a filing or event materially changes the case. The universe size, update commitment and turnaround after results are fixed in the engagement letter. Coverage is added or dropped at the start of a quarter, not mid-cycle.
Where a value has to be filed, signed or relied on for a statutory purpose rather than used to inform an investment view.
The same research discipline applied to a capital project, with project cost, means of finance and debt service coverage.
Turning the screening and monitoring work into a maintained internal dashboard rather than a periodic report.